Milk: Spiritually-Challenging, Oscar-Worthy

“My name is Harvey Milk, and I am here to recruit you!”

Let’s get one thing straight—Milk is gay. Director Gus van Sant’s look at the career and assassination of Harvey Milk, the first openly gay elected official in America, does not flinch in its depiction of the gay subculture that flourished in San Francisco between the summer of love in 1967 and the outbreak of AIDS. Cinematographer Harris Savides’ camera spends equal time in gay bars and city hall, capturing a moment in history when private lives turned very public.

home-image

As Harvey Milk, Sean Penn doesn’t hold back, kissing his male co-stars James Franco (Hairspray) and Diego Luna (Y Tu Mama Tambien) with an abandon as unself-conscious as his performance. As the film opens, Harvey is on the brink of his 40th birthday, which he spends in bed with Scott (Franco), a younger man he picks up on the subway in New York City. Buoyed by the ecstasy of early infatuation, Harvey and Scott decide to start over in San Francisco, opening up a camera shop, which becomes a gay haven. When Harvey is informally dubbed “The Mayor of Castro Street,” he begins to dream of holding public office.

Harvey Milk was a born politician, with a natural charisma and fearlessness that won people to his cause. One such recruit is Cleve Jones (Emile Hirsch). He tries to brush Harvey off and instead, ends up one of his closest aides when Milk is finally elected to San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors. Penn directed Hirsch in the underappreciated Into the Wild, and onscreen they have a natural chemistry that reminds the audience that not all relationships between gay men have to be sexual.

Harvey Milk’s tragic end has already been immortalized in the 1984 documentary The Times of Harvey Milk, so there’s no reason to play coy with the facts. Milk and San Francisco mayor George Moscone (Victor Garber) were shot to death by Milk’s fellow supervisor Dan White (Josh Brolin), who claimed that too much junk food had driven him out of his mind. But van Sant and screenwriter Dustin Lance Black find so much more in Harvey Milk’s story, especially by focusing on the toll that his relentless ambition took on his personal relationships.

Penn is astonishingly good. Even with his track record as an actor who reinvents himself with every role, this performance surpasses anything he’s ever done. He doesn’t hold back from playing Harvey as a proudly out homosexual. He doesn’t let any part of himself say to the audience, “Don’t forget I’m not actually gay.” The performance is brave, it’s enthusiastic, and most of all it’s entertaining.

Entertainment value in and of itself isn’t what makes Milk a must-see film for Christian audiences. Milk is worth watching because it is a portrait of go-for-broke advocacy of the “don’t hide your light under a bushel” kind. Milk consistently urged his aides, confidantes, friends and fans to go public. He believed that keeping one’s sexuality a secret gave power to those who would deny basic human rights to American citizens.

He knew that disclosure takes away the enemy’s biggest weapon. It wasn’t just gay pride for Harvey, either. He believed that secret is just another word for lie. While Harvey Milk’s personal life poses challenges for a Christian audience, his openness is worth imitating by Christians, for many of whom, cowardice and life in the closet are lies that deny the ultimate Truth.

Milk deserves its place as one of the best movies of 2008. As a portrait of a man sold out for his beliefs, it is a tutorial in publicly, authentically living out one’s commitments that no Christian should miss. Harvey Milk left behind a legacy that extended far beyond his immediate world. How many Christians can say the same?

Annie Frisbie is a Writers Guild of America Award-nominated screenwriter, film critic, and adjunct instructor of creative writing at Bethel University’s New York Center for Art and Media Studies.


8 Comments

  1. by Jeanne Walsh
    Posted February 23, 2009 at 7:55 am · Permalink

    After reading your article, which I assume is targeted at a Christian audience, I am amazed that you could come to the conclusion that this is a must see.
    Clearly Milk was living in a lifestyle that is contrary to the bible. God condemns homosexuality, whether it is nobly portrayed or embraced by a deceived culture.
    What could possibly be the value for Christians in viewing this film? We need to pray for people like Milk that they woukd embrace the godpel of Jesus Christ and be set free from the perversion that keeps them bound.
    I am disappointed and frankly bewildered why you have joined the culture that embraces behavior that is clearly against God’s law and the natural order in favor of tolerance.

  2. Posted February 23, 2009 at 10:28 am · Permalink

    Speaking as a Christian who loves cinema of all kinds, why is it that a film can’t be recommended simply because it’s good? Why can’t it merely be a must-see film, rather than a must-see film for Christian audiences? I haven’t seen Milk, but knowing the considerable talents of Penn and Gus Van Sant I can surely imagine that it’s a terrific film. But to try and make this sad story an application of Matthew 5:14-16 that Christians should imitate is quite a stretch.

  3. by Chris
    Posted February 23, 2009 at 12:17 pm · Permalink

    Jeanne,

    Thank you for your interest in gospelandculture.org and for caring enough to respond to one of our reviews. Your opinion is valued.

    First, let me respond to the serious charge in your comment. You say that we as a site have “joined the culture that embraces behavior that is clearly against God’s law and the natural order in favor of tolerance.” That is a very severe accusation which is untrue. The Bible holds us to a high level in terms of our speech to each other. These comments falsely present us. At no time have we ever condoned or supported a gay life style. Nor have we ever demonstrated tolerance for it.

    We do however seek to unmask the ways in which our culture works. For instance, please note this passage in my essay on the Oscars:

    “…the battle for hearts and minds is being won largely through portrayal, not propositions. From Will & Grace to Milk, attitudes toward behaviors such as homosexuality are shifting significantly as audiences identify with characters that embody specific lifestyles. Meanwhile, the church continues to behave as if the game is happening more or less within its walls.

    With a few exceptions, apart from reactionary, demonizing rhetoric, entertainment culture continues to be treated as if it is not serious and therefore not worthy of the church’s attention. We fund missions and ignore the global proliferation of media content shaping the souls of every people group on the planet.”

    In writing this, I am indicating the need for Christians to understand cultural dynamics so that we can meaningfully respond to them.

    Our intervention, in encouraging Christians who feel called to be actively involved in engaging entertainment culture, involves (among many other things) unmasking the ways in which our culture leads individuals down paths that lead away from following Christ in holiness and purity.

    We do commend media that help us to understand key issues in our culture. We also commend quality. By doing so, we do not necessarily commend the lifestyles or ideologies they portray. If you want to object to our reviews, you can’t stop with Milk. The Wrestler, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button and Slumdog Millionaire all portray extra-marital sex. Slumdog Millionaire portrays rape and theft(favorably) as well. Doubt is about a priest who appears to be molesting young boys. We can’t really stop there as we must also throw a broad range of cultural expression ranging from Dickens to Picasso on the “do not come into contact with” pile.

    If we condemn everything that portrays unrighteousness, we end up needing to condemn the Bible, which portrays a woman being cut into pieces and David ordering a mafia hit to cover up his adultery along with a myriad of other sinful acts. I say this in no way to denigrate Scripture. I make this observation only to point out the fallacy involved in equating commending a portrayal with commending the acts it portrays.

    As for Annie Frisbie’s commendation of Milk specifically to Christians, we urge our authors to write about culture out of their Christian convictions. You don’t have to agree with them, but unless the writer’s outlook violates the commands of Scripture, it is sinful to condemn them. We are part of one body after all.

    Stephen, regarding your comment about Matt. 5:14-16, sometimes our writers connect their reviews to the Christian faith, sometimes they don’t. Your comment about applying the passage to the film being a stretch may be right. Thanks for offering it.

    We welcome conversations of this sort. It is in talking about the morality of cultural engagement that we may grow in our understanding of how we should do it to the glory of God. However, we do have a responsibility for the character of our speech. We pray that we might all take care in how we communicate.

    Chris Simmons, editor, gospelandculture.org

  4. Posted February 23, 2009 at 5:03 pm · Permalink

    Chris

    Brilliant response. I think that your examples of the Scripture and the stories/portrayals it contains is something the critics need to think seriously about.

    My–if the Bible were a movie..what would it be rated..whew.

  5. Posted February 23, 2009 at 6:12 pm · Permalink

    Chris,

    I agree, and I hope that more Christians will start to own up to the “art”, if I may use that word, of carefully obeying all that Christ commands. When we try to exclude all films such as “Milk” we end up, if we want to be consistent, excluding almost all cultural venues.

  6. by Jason
    Posted February 23, 2009 at 7:12 pm · Permalink

    the reviewer writes:

    “Entertainment value in and of itself isn’t what makes Milk a must-see film for Christian audiences. Milk is worth watching because it is a portrait of go-for-broke advocacy of the “don’t hide your light under a bushel” kind…”

    I’ll try to be more precise in my comment/question: if I should decide to follow this line of reasoning–that is, that i should celebrate any movie that portrays that “go for broke, don’t hide your light under a bushel,” then why not celebrate a movie depicting the great loyalty Hitler inspired among his followers?

    Jason

  7. by Chris
    Posted February 23, 2009 at 7:22 pm · Permalink

    Jason,

    No one ever said that we should celebrate any film that has a go for broke attitude.
    If you’re asking if it is legitimate to learn from fallen people, the answer is yes. It really depends on what one might learn from them.

    But also, regarding your question about Hitler, I would highly recommend the critically acclaimed, 2005 Oscar-nominated film “Downfall,” which depicts Hitler’s last days. The devotion he builds in his followers is quite remarkable. Here is a link to the film’s website, in case you want to look: http://www.downfallthefilm.com/.

    Chris

  8. Posted February 23, 2009 at 9:44 pm · Permalink

    I had to leave this personal stuff out of my review because the review isn’t supposed to be about me, but I’m glad to have the chance to offer an addendum in these comments.

    My main reason for recommending Milk is because it made me realize how much of a coward I can be in living out my faith. I’m afraid to tell people that I’m a Christian because I’m scared that I’ll be rejected. I was humbled and convicted by watching this man act the way I should act, without fear of the repercussions. Why is it that I cannot do the same? Why do I hide my light under a bushel, when the light I’ve been given comes from the light of the world?

    My point is not that we should accept the object of Milk’s passions, but rather that those of us who struggle with fear might learn from Milk’s bravery. Sometimes lessons come from the most unlikely of places–like from a man who denied Christ on the night of the crucifixion.

    Hope this clarifies my position. As a longtime member of a PCA church, I take orthodoxy quite seriously indeed.

    Have mercy on me, a sinner.